Development, anywhere in the world, is rarely explosive.

Nations do not transform in one grand boom but through a series of interactions between people, institutions, and ideologies.

Here I argue that progress depends not only on the quality of the elements that make up a nation, but on how they combine.

A country may have strong institutions, visionary leadership, and abundant talent, yet remain inert if those elements never interact under the right conditions.

Understanding national progress from the point of view of a chemical process reveals an important truth:

The elements of nationhood

Every nation could be described as a periodic table of elements.

The elements being its citizens, government, private sector, civil society, and culture

Each of these elements have their own valence and tendency to bond or repel.

Some elements are noble gases: stable, self-contained, and unwilling to combine. For example, politically-neutral citizens and public institutions that are slow to adopt change.

Others are highly reactive, burning with potential energy but unstable without structure. For example, youth movements, entrepreneurs, and reformers.

The chemistry of governance lies in knowing how to bring these elements together without combustion or corrosion.

Policy, like laboratory design, is about controlling the conditions such as temperature, pressure, and concentration under which reaction occurs.

Too much political heat, and systems melt; too little, and nothing moves.

Bonds: the glue of collective action

Chemical bonds determine whether molecules form and endure.

In national systems, trust serves the same function.

It is the invisible glue that binds citizens to the state, businesses to regulations, and institutions to one another.

When trust is weak, society becomes a collection of reactive atoms, each pursuing survival in isolation. When trust is strong, shared purpose forms durable compounds: public-private partnerships, social contracts, national identities.

The difficulty is that trust, like covalent bonding, takes energy to form but can break apart under stress.

Scandals, corruption, or inequality act as acids, dissolving the social fabric.

Rebuilding trust requires catalysts such as transparent data, consistent justice, and credible leadership to accelerate re-bonding without overheating the system.

Catalysts: agents of acceleration

Not all reaction requires a catalyst. But when a catalyst is involved, the reaction speeds up.

A catalyst is an agent that speeds up change without being consumed by it.

In national development, catalysts are often institutions, leaders, or moments that lower the “activation energy” required for a change.

For example, a bold policy experiment (like mobile money in Kenya) can catalyse entire industries.

A generational leader (like Mandela or Deng Xiaoping) can reorient social chemistry by changing what elements are willing to bond.

Even crises (pandemics, currency collapses, or social movements) can serve as catalytic events, rearranging the molecules of national will.

The secret to sustainable and tangible change is recognising catalysts early, leveraging them to the nation's advantage, and stabilising them before they dissipate.

Reaction conditions

No reaction happens in a vacuum.

The rate and quality of transformation depend on conditions such as pressure, temperature, and concentration.

• Pressure in national systems represents public demand, competition, or crisis. Moderate pressure sharpens focus; excessive pressure causes breakdown.
• Temperature mirrors political climate. Too cold (apathy) and reforms stall; too hot (polarisation) and the system burns out.
• Concentration reflects the density of effort. That is, how many capable actors are working on a problem at once. Diffuse energy produces noise; concentrated energy produces breakthroughs.

Change-makers must learn to manage conditions, not just inputs.

A well-timed intervention in a conducive environment can trigger reactions that decades of funding could not achieve under poor conditions.

Equilibrium and reversibility

In chemistry, most reactions reach equilibrium.

That is, a dynamic balance where forward and reverse reactions occur at equal rates.

Nations, too, exist in equilibrium: progress and regression tugging in opposite directions.

A reform may move a country forward, but opposing reactions like corruption, fatigue, policy reversal pull it back. Without continual input of energy, even the most promising changes revert to old states.

This is why governance is not a one-off event but a continuous process of maintaining disequilibrium by keeping the system ever so slightly off balance toward improvement.

The goal is not permanent stability but productive instability, where motion never fully stops.

Nobody wants a plateaued or regressive economy.

The productive instability or shake up of situations is therefore tricky but extremely necessary.

Corrosion and contamination

No chemical system is immune to decay. Over time, exposure to impurities corrodes even the strongest compounds.

In national life, contamination takes the form of misinformation, bad governance, or cynicism. These toxins weaken bonds and distort reactions.

Corrosion often begins invisibly through small ethical compromises or data manipulation, and spreads until the entire structure weakens.

The antidote is transparency, which in chemical terms is like purifying the medium so reactions can proceed cleanly.

Good governance, in essence, is corrosion control.

Compound formation: the emergence of new substances

When the right elements bond under favourable conditions, they form new compounds that are stable, self-sustaining structures with properties distinct from their components.

So is it with institutions.

When the government collaborates authentically with business, academia, and citizens, the outcome is not a loose coalition but a new compound: a functional innovation ecosystem, a developmental state, or a regional value chain.

Such compounds, once formed and governed responsibly, often outlast their creators.

They represent the true alchemy of reform, the moment when ideas crystallise into enduring institutions.

Energy release: the power of reaction

Every chemical reaction either absorbs or releases energy.

Endothermic reactions require continuous input; exothermic ones generate their own heat.

Reforms that depend entirely on donor funding or external incentives are endothermic; they stop once energy supply ceases.

Endogenous reforms, those driven by internal conviction and citizen pressure are exothermic, releasing energy that fuels further progress.

The challenge for emerging economies is to shift from donor-driven and western validation seeking to self-sustaining reactions; from borrowed energy to internal combustion.

Conclusion

The chemistry of development teaches that progress is neither automatic nor permanent.

It must be cooked.

The right elements, under the right conditions, forming the right bonds, catalysed by the right agents.

It’s like my interpretation of how the authors of “Why Nations Fail” described progress made by institutions:

Institutional divergence = Vector function of (institutional drift x critical juncture)

For institutions to completely diverge from their old state to a state that encourages national prosperity, the positive little by little changes experienced by the institutions must compound to a point in the history of the nation (real time, of course) where it is naturally irreversible to return to their old states.

And I say vector function because both the drift and critical juncture have quantities and direction. The drift could be negative or positive, and the moment in history is directional as well.

In this sense, development is less about assembling the ingredients to cook a prosperous nation than about mastering reactions and timing.

That is, mastering how, when, where, and if the different ingredients work together.

While biology sustains nations, chemistry binds them together determining whether their energies combine into synergy or dissipate into entropy.

The most prosperous societies are those that understand how to bond difference into strength, turn tension into synthesis, and keep reacting productively, long after the initial spark has passed.

Every week, this newsletter Development Hacks delivers strategic thinking + doing tools for public leaders, economic policymakers, and system builders working to shape emerging economies from the inside out. If this article challenged your perspective, forward it to someone making decisions at scale.